JamesPolk.net

Current GPU Landscape: Interoperability & Geopolitical Risks by Brand

Here’s a comprehensive breakdown of the current GPU landscape, how different GPU vendors fit into AI tech stacks, their interoperability, and the geopolitical risks that may affect supply:

Major GPU Companies

There are a limited number of companies that manufacture general-purpose GPUs for AI, HPC, and graphics computing:

1. NVIDIA

  • Market leader in AI, deep learning, and ML acceleration.

  • Known for: CUDA ecosystem, cuDNN, TensorRT, and dominance in model training/inference.

  • Hardware: A100, H100, RTX/Quadro, Jetson (embedded), etc.

  • Software stack integration is seamless, making it the preferred choice in research and production environments.

2. AMD (Advanced Micro Devices)

  • Competitive in gaming and high-performance compute (HPC).

  • Known for: ROCm (Radeon Open Compute), Instinct MI300 series.

  • ROCm has limited support for many mainstream AI frameworks compared to NVIDIA’s CUDA.

  • Often used in cost-sensitive or open-source GPU deployments.

3. Intel

  • Entered the GPU market more recently.

  • Known for: Intel Data Center GPU Max, Xe series, Habana Gaudi (for AI-specific acceleration).

  • Software stack is still maturing; more suited to specific industrial or enterprise contexts.

4. Apple (for consumer devices)

  • Apple’s M-series chips (M1, M2, M3) include integrated GPUs used in on-device ML, but not used in large-scale AI training setups.

  • Mainly used in macOS apps with CoreML and Metal.

5. Graphcore (UK)

  • Specializes in AI-specific chips called IPUs (Intelligence Processing Units).

  • Competes with NVIDIA on certain workloads but niche adoption.

  • Less supported in mainstream ML/DL frameworks.

6. Cerebras, SambaNova, Tenstorrent, etc.

  • These are AI accelerator startups that build domain-specific chips (e.g., wafer-scale engines).

  • They compete more with TPUs and custom ASICs than general GPUs.

  • Still not general-purpose GPU replacements.

GPU Use in AI Tech Stacks

Key AI stack layers affected:

  • Training (Deep Learning): NVIDIA dominates due to CUDA, PyTorch, TensorFlow compatibility.

  • Inference (Edge & Cloud): Mix of NVIDIA, AMD, Intel; often supplemented with FPGAs or ASICs.

  • Deployment & Virtualization: Supported by software like Docker, Kubernetes with GPU plugins; NVIDIA again leads here.

Interoperability:

  • Heterogeneous GPU setups (e.g., NVIDIA + AMD) are technically possible using containerization or separate workloads, but:

    • Shared memory and direct communication are not efficient across brands.

    • Software frameworks often optimize for one ecosystem (e.g., TensorFlow for CUDA).

  • Multi-GPU from same vendor: Strong support for parallelism (NVIDIA NVLink, AMD Infinity Fabric).

Geopolitical Risk: Supply Chain & Politics

Key concerns if US-China tensions escalate:

  • NVIDIA & AMD: Design in the US, fab in Taiwan (TSMC) — vulnerable if Taiwan is disrupted.

  • Intel: US and Israel fabs — potentially safer geopolitically.

  • SMIC (China): Limited to 14nm, unlikely to produce top-tier AI chips soon.

  • Huawei Ascend AI chips: In China, but blocked from global export and limited ecosystem adoption.

If tensions worsen:

  • The US may further restrict advanced chip exports to China (as already seen with NVIDIA’s H100/A100).

  • Domestic production (e.g., via TSMC Arizona, Intel fabs) is slow to ramp up.

  • Supply of NVIDIA/AMD GPUs could bottleneck, especially high-end AI models.

  • Long term: US investment in CHIPS Act and allies (e.g., South Korea, Japan) may reduce reliance on Taiwan/China.

Strategic Recommendations

If you’re planning AI infrastructure or investment:

  1. Diversify vendors — Explore AMD/Intel where viable.

  2. Use modular system design — Containerized AI workflows allow flexibility.

  3. Keep a buffer of compute — In case of embargoes or restrictions.

  4. Watch US policy — Especially on export controls and domestic fab incentives.